Solid deck, one of the better ones I have seen at this stage. It has potential to improve on numbers, big picture, differentiation and personal connection.

The deck is missing some key elements that are needed for investor/sponsor conviction: Visionary big picture, key numbers or charts that quantify value for stakeholders and investors, and track record for positioning the startup at the seed stage instead of pre-seed.

The deck follows the standard startup investor deck outline, and has a good enough story arc. Perhaps, the stakes can be raised by quantifying the social impact of the problem, and what a future with Therapix instead might look like.

There is potential to use numbers to drive conviction - Quantifying the pain, value, scale and track record is key. More importantly, is there a key number or phrase that would stick with the audience after they read it?

Investors lean in through emotion and validate with reasoning. There is potential to create more of an emotional arc, and also drive a personal connection with a story or example.

Finally, some venture investors might not be interested because the startup does not express enough venture-scale characteristics - Large Moat, exponential unit economics, turnkey GTM process etc. This might not be important if the audience is not VC. However, it can be addressed first outside of the pitch deck by looking at the business model, and identifying opportunities to unlock the unit economics needed.